The Elliot Institute News

From the Leader in Post-Abortion Research

 

 

 

Vol. 13, No. 8 -- October 30, 2014

 



Visit Us Online: www.AfterAbortion.org


The UnChoice Campaign: TheUnChoice.com 

 

Sign up to Receive This E-Newsletter

 


 

IN THIS ISSUE:

 

 


 

Conscience Leads to More Complete Support for Women

Cushta Hassan, RN & Joseph Hassan, MBchB

A year ago, Kai Tiaki Nursing New Zealand published Rose Stewart’s challenging ar­ticle, “Conscience ‘not always a force for good’,” giving her perspective on conscience and health care.[1]

In the article, Stewart expressed her concern that health professionals who invoke their conscientious objection to abortion or contra­ception risk infringing the rights of women to reproductive health care. She argued “con­science is not always a force for good.”

In this article, we suggest freedom of con­science is essential for a health-care worker and protects the rights of the patient, the health-care worker and society as a whole.

As health-care workers, we bring ourselves as whole persons to our important role. We are present as real people, not robots. Our background, culture, beliefs, and especially conscience, will and should, affect how we care for our patients.

Continue reading ...


back to top

 


 

Still Trying to Use Junk Science to Disprove Post-Abortion Trauma Syndrome

Priscilla Coleman, Ph.D.

On October 6th an article titled Is So-Called Post-Abortion Trauma Syndrome a Myth?, written by Zawn Villines, appeared on GoodTherapy. In order to address the question she poses, Villines does not focus on the large international body of peer-reviewed scientific evidence indicating that abortion increases women’s risk of experiencing mental health problems. Instead she exclusively describes results of the flawed Turnaway Study, led by Diana Greene Foster.

Villines highlights the Turnaway findings that there were no significant differences in mental health trajectories between (1) women who had abortions and (2) those denied abortions, because their pregnancies had advanced beyond the legal gestational limit. Villines neglected to mention that 60 percent of the women in the Turnaway group who continued their pregnancies expressed happiness about their pregnancies. And no mention is made by Villines of the glaring methodological shortcomings of the Turnaway study.

The following major problems, among others, preclude trust in all the results obtained.

Continue reading ...
 

back to top

 


 

Submit Your Articles to the Elliot Institute

 

We are always interested in publishing relevant content from guest experts, or thoughtful people, or those who just want to share their stories.

We are always interested in publishing relevant content from guest experts, thoughtful people, or those who just want to share their story.

We also welcome regular contributors who may be willing to provide content every month or so.

Go here for guidelines on submitting an article or proposal for an article to the Elliot Institute.

 

back to top

 

 

 

Learn More, Share More, Help More

Links to Important Information and Resources

 

Additional Resources

 

Pregnancy and After-Abortion Help

 

Get the Latest Information, First

Not receiving this e-newsletter? Want to be the first to get the latest information on research, outreach projects and more? Sign up for our e-news list here.

 

 

Be A Partner in Our Work
The Elliot Institute conducts original research on the impact of abortion and  provides many free educational resources to individuals and groups. However, we need your help for this work to continue. Please consider supporting our work with a tax-deductible donation.

 

 

Contact Information

Contact the Elliot Institute at elliotinstitute@gmail.com


back to top

 

 


 

 


Please Forward this Email to Your Friends and Associates.
 But if you do forward it, you should remove the unsubscribe link at the bottom or they may unsubscribe YOU by mistake.